Back to Feed

Karakatsanis pair accused of elevating the bicarb levels australian-racing-0719

Karakatsanis pair accused of elevating the bicarb levels

Matt Rigby | Australian Racing | Tue 8 January, 2013

RACING Victoria has accused trainer Con Karakatsanis and his father Tony of conspiring to elevate the bicarb level of their galloper Howmuchdoyouloveme "to enhance its performance" on race day.

Dr Cliff Pannam, on behalf of stewards, conceded to Tony Karakatsanis at an Racing Appeals and Disciplinary Board hearing today that "it was not your intention to administer a salt solution (drench) to the horse before the race."

He agreed with the pair, who yesterday said that doing so only three hours before the Yellowglen Stakes at Flemington on November 3 would have had an adverse effect on the galloper's health as tubing generally dehydrates a horse before it re-hydrates.

"However I suggest that you intended to put a goodly quantity of bicarb in a solution and you were going to administer it to him before the race," Dr Pannan said.

Dr Pannan said that Tony Karakatsanis, formerly a trainer for 25 years and now stable assistant for his son, was an expert on bicarb levels and was aware of the threshold of 36 mMols, and that Howmuchdoyouloveme had a resting level of about 33.

 


"You knew how much to give to the horse to keep it under the threshold," Dr Pannan suggested.

Tony Karakatsanis said he gave the galloper bicarb in a "bran mash" for dinner and also used it when tubing the horse.

"But I didn't use it and I don't think anyone can know how much to give to ensure a horse remains under the limit," he said.

Earlier he said that he had simply "made a mistake" when he picked up a white feed back containing tubing equipment instead of what he believed to be a back with hay in it.

He conceded there was not another bag in the feed shed that contained hay.

"I thought I did (put hay in another bag) but obviously I didn't," he said.

Con and Tony Karakatsanis have pleaded not guilty to five charges.

The hearing is continuing.

 

story Super racing

8 Comments | 1 decade ago

Recent Comments

User darkshines

darkshines 09 Jan | Posts: 2825

As always, only real winner is the lawyers. Their fee to the father/son will probably be worth more than a fine :))

User TheDiva

TheDiva 09 Jan | Posts: 11782

it sounds like the lawyers picking holes in the prosecution to be honest. Im not sure how stewards, with no police training, are supposed to compete against lawyers when it comes to the appeals process.

User RIO

RIO 09 Jan | Posts: 14798

in that case were they going to do it with a bag of hay???? cos that is what he thought he had in the bag.. =)) =))

User TheDiva

TheDiva 09 Jan | Posts: 11782

read today's paper, the hearing has taken a turn now. Apparently their intention was to tube it AFTER the race, so they may get off on a technicality!

User dungy

dungy 09 Jan | Posts: 9217

What a classic. Competent trainer confuses bag of drenching gear with bag of hay. Yeah, and my horse went moooo! 8-} Competent trainer thought he filled a bag with hay but turns out he didn't? The bloke should get life for being a filthy lying **** Ag...

User DarkTarget

DarkTarget 09 Jan | Posts: 222

What a classic. Competent trainer confuses bag of drenching gear with bag of hay. Yeah, and my horse went moooo! 8-} Competent trainer thought he filled a bag with hay but turns out he didn't? The bloke should get life for being a filthy lying ****

User dungy

dungy 09 Jan | Posts: 9217

What a classic. Competent trainer confuses bag of drenching gear with bag of hay. Yeah, and my horse went moooo! 8-} Yeh but ask Wilson and he will tell ya we all read Dick Francis novels :)

User Brubaker

Brubaker 09 Jan | Posts: 217

What a classic. Competent trainer confuses bag of drenching gear with bag of hay. Yeah, and my horse went moooo! 8-}