G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 35 Non Members

Ashes Test 2

Sport

Comments

  • rustyhrustyh    2,275 posts
    :D :D
    Warney!!
    Bring back Mr Plastic.
    Glow in the dark teeth, orange skinned, shaggy haired blonde tipped spinning machine!
    Be great for his sponsors and the TV ratings would be thru the roof.
    WACA would be centre of the universe next week.
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    said:

    Yep :
    - SE Marsh
    - AB McDonald

    McDonald injured - broken hand
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    Yep, realised that - after
  • rustyhrustyh    2,275 posts
    :shock: :shock:
    Just off the 'wikileaks' forum.
    R.Ponting vice captain.
    S.Warne captain comeback.
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    said:

    Ferguson may have just cemented his spot in the test side

    If media reports are true, looks like the test team is just about finalised:
    Hughes
    Watson
    Ponting
    Clarke
    Hussey
    Haddin
    Smith
    Johnson
    Harris
    Hilfenhaus
    Siddle

    I can't see that team beating England.... :roll:
    Any danger of picking our best side? Katich was not an opener before being thrust into the position to fill a gap, so why pick an out of form crab who happens to open in shield cricket....
    Push Hussey up to open and play Khawaja or Ferguson.

    Must be playing Johnson for his batting.... :roll:
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    Johnson has to play.
    Wildcard - won't beat them without him, so nothing to lose by playing him.
  • PrecisionPrecision    295 posts
    12 man squad named

    Ricky Ponting (c)
    Michael Clarke (vc)
    Michael Beer
    Brad Haddin
    Ryan Harris
    Phillip Hughes
    Ben Hilfenhaus
    Mike Hussey WA
    Mitchell Johnson
    Peter Siddle
    Steven Smith
    Shane Watson

    Seems Shane Warne still has pull
  • interesting - would have to think Beer or Smith 12th man unless the pitch is really flat
  • PrecisionPrecision    295 posts
    Thought i'd post the team then comment.

    Main point is i don't see why they name the team so early! There are games going on right now and the message they are sending is that results in these matches don't matter. And proof of that is Hughes got a duck moments before they named the team, that's 4 and 0 in his last match and they are bringing him into a very important test match.

    Smith is not a good selelction either, his batting won't stand up to Test level and his bowling is rubbish. And Johnson what a joke, he wasn't good enough to get a game in Adelaide yet with no matches between now and then all of a sudden he is. If they wanted to play him fine but he should be playing in Brisbane right now he hasn't played since the first Test.
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    Interesting - Whore v Smith at the SCG today.............

    Whore - 3 wickets
    Smith - 8 wickets

    ie on equal terms. Same day, same pitch etc.
    Would say that ended any chance of Hauritz getting a recall.
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    Here's the squad:
    Australian squad for WACA Test:
    Ricky Ponting (c)
    Michael Clarke (vc)
    Michael Beer
    Brad Haddin
    Ryan Harris
    Phillip Hughes
    Ben Hilfenhaus
    Mike Hussey WA
    Mitchell Johnson
    Peter Siddle
    Steven Smith
    Shane Watson

    As predicted. Beer won't play as leaves the batting short
  • said:

    Thought i'd post the team then comment.

    Main point is i don't see why they name the team so early! There are games going on right now and the message they are sending is that results in these matches don't matter. And proof of that is Hughes got a duck moments before they named the team, that's 4 and 0 in his last match and they are bringing him into a very important test match.

    Smith is not a good selelction either, his batting won't stand up to Test level and his bowling is rubbish. And Johnson what a joke, he wasn't good enough to get a game in Adelaide yet with no matches between now and then all of a sudden he is. If they wanted to play him fine but he should be playing in Brisbane right now he hasn't played since the first Test.


    Disagree with most of that

    Hughes has played well before his last match and is a logical spot as opener

    Smith is a viable option as an all-rounder

    Johnson needs to build his confidence up - has obviously been doing work in the nets - selectors would be getting feedback. As his best he is clearly our no 1 bowling - like Tivers said - nothing to lose by picking him

    Do agree they pick the squad too early - altho there is probably some reasons
  • PrecisionPrecision    295 posts
    said:

    said:

    Thought i'd post the team then comment.

    Main point is i don't see why they name the team so early! There are games going on right now and the message they are sending is that results in these matches don't matter. And proof of that is Hughes got a duck moments before they named the team, that's 4 and 0 in his last match and they are bringing him into a very important test match.

    Smith is not a good selelction either, his batting won't stand up to Test level and his bowling is rubbish. And Johnson what a joke, he wasn't good enough to get a game in Adelaide yet with no matches between now and then all of a sudden he is. If they wanted to play him fine but he should be playing in Brisbane right now he hasn't played since the first Test.


    Disagree with most of that

    Hughes has played well before his last match and is a logical spot as opener

    Smith is a viable option as an all-rounder

    Johnson needs to build his confidence up - has obviously been doing work in the nets - selectors would be getting feedback. As his best he is clearly our no 1 bowling - like Tivers said - nothing to lose by picking him

    Do agree they pick the squad too early - altho there is probably some reasons
    Hughes now averaging 13 for NSW in shield cricket this year, if that's quite well then fair enough.

    Smith well time will tell who's right there.

    Johnson if he needs to build his confidence up he needs to play sheild cricket not come out against the poms again where everytime he bowls a bad ball it's gonna be put away by quality cricketers.
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    Yep.
    Backed themselves in to a corner naming Hughes (already)
    Can't play Smith and Beer, so Hughes has to - but will be a disaster.

    Now got one opener that isn't an opener, and one that can't play outside his off stump or over his shoulder (at the WACA !!!)

    F Me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    edited December 2010
    said:

    Yep.
    Backed themselves in to a corner naming Hughes (already)
    Can't play Smith and Beer, so Hughes has to - but will be a disaster.

    Now got one opener that isn't an opener, and one that can't only play outside his off stump(at the WACA !!!)

    F Me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Won't play Beer as means Haddin would bat 6 and 5 bowlers.
    Hughes will do f all, so really only playing 5 bats and a keeper/bat.
    Only playing 3 front line bowlers too. Johnson is baggage, Watson and Smith.

    With Watson in the side, should only play 3 other seamers anyway.
    Agree with Smith's inlcusion and probably Hilfy, but Johnson and Hughes don't deserve to be there.
    Hussey to open and play both Khawaja and Ferguson. Smith bats 8 and 3 seamers.

    Watson
    Hussey
    Ponting
    Clarke
    Khawaja
    Ferguson
    Haddin
    Smith
    Harris
    Copeland or Cameron
    Hilfenhaus

    What price the poms?
  • PrecisionPrecision    295 posts
    Funky why open with Hussey when he's the one thing we got going right for us at the moment, wouldn't even contemplate moving him in the order.
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    said:

    Funky why open with Hussey when he's the one thing we got going right for us at the moment, wouldn't even contemplate moving him in the order.

    Made made his name as an opener and has the technique to do so.
    Certainly a better option than Hughes and the side would be stronger with Khawaja and/or Ferguson in it rather than Hughes.
    He was facing the new ball last test anyway when we were 3 for f all!

    But the main reason is that Khawaja and Ferguson are our future. Hussey hasn't got that long left so he can fill the opening void until either Katich comes back or we uncover a decent opener.
    He can then either drop back to the middle order, or if the young guns are performing then make a decision on his future.
    However I reckon he would keep Katich out of the team if it came down to a fight for the opening spot.

    I guess it will be piss funny watching Hughes backing away to square leg when the poms come around the wicket and bowl at his body :oops: :lol:
    Before he nicks one to the grippers
  • give up Funkster - thats a terrible side you have picked :P

    Hughes has been doing a lot of work on his batting - his last ODI Innings was very impressive
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    Pretty sure Ashes matches are Tests, not ODIs ?
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    said:

    give up Funkster - thats a terrible side you have picked :P

    Hughes has been doing a lot of work on his batting - his last ODI Innings was very impressive

    Just like Johnson has been doing a lot of work on his bowling...... Rumour is they removed the stumps and took down the side nets when he (Johnson) was training as they didnt want to destroy his confidence :P
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    One gander at his missus would soon restore his confidence.............
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    He's probably suffering from spousal abuse :P
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    A billiant selection has just been made that will ensure an Aussie win.
    I was having a bet and selected ENGLAND to win the 3rd test !
  • said:

    Good idea Funkster

    I will go with

    Hughes
    Watson
    Ponting
    Clarke
    Hussey
    Ferguson
    Haddin
    Smith
    Johnson
    Hilfenhaus
    Siddle
    Harris 12th Man

    wasnt far wrong :P had the starting 11 in my 12
Sign In or Register to comment.