G'day Punter!

Sign In Register

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 55 Non Members

we have been zzzzappp!'ed

West Australian Racing

Comments

  • ReinsReins    27 posts
    12 months

    http://www.perthracing.com.au/news.aspx?ContentID=22110
    +1 -1
  • H-BOMBERH-BOMBER    10,567 posts
    Effective immediately as well......
    +1 -1
  • doopadoopa    35 posts
    Does this mean his horses racing tomorrow in Narrogin are scratched or just transferred to someone elses name?
    +1 -1
  • H-BOMBERH-BOMBER    10,567 posts
    I think there will have to be a trainer change. Bad timing with Mr Moneypenny racing at caulfield tomorrow and Guest Wing on Saturday....
    +1 -1
  • thefalconthefalcon    20,481 posts
    I bet they already have new homes. Don't forget lex piper already has horse in Vic....no problems...
    +1 -1
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    Lex doesnt own MMP Edwards owns it with the Airtransport bloke
    +1 -1
  • thefalconthefalcon    20,481 posts
    I was specifically talking about Guest Wing.....they'll probably both go to the same trainer.
    +1 -1
  • RhinoRhino    208 posts
    appeal will be heard 4th of feb
    +1 -1
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    said:

    I think he's Edward's foreman...

    Float Driver, Reg is well into his late 70's
    +1 -1
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    GEE that was impressive beaten a lazy 15-20l he will never change SE at the first chance he loves to get them over there but unlucky for him and connections the ones he takes are never that good !!!!
    What a week he has had im tipping a stiff drink tonight for Shane
    +1 -1
  • agro58agro58    294 posts
    first time i have seen someone get less than 5 years for pocessing an electical devise, so i'd cop 12 months.
    +1 -1
  • jigajiga    15 posts
    i agree agro
    seems a bit lienient,when you look at whats been handed out in the past
    good luck to s.edwards but :lol:

    be intrested to see what the next person caught with an electrical device gets
    +1 -1
  • cubescubes    689 posts
    said:

    i agree agro
    seems a bit lienient,when you look at whats been handed out in the past
    good luck to s.edwards but :lol:

    be intrested to see what the next person caught with an electrical device gets

    Reckon they will all offer as a defence it was for protection. have set a precedent now.
    +1 -1
  • silkssilks    53 posts
    12 months mfa what a bloody joke i might do it just to see what i get. So he is not allowed near a race horse or stable or racetrack is that right yeh and going for another an appeal who does he think he is, i know what he is and the stewards who gave the sentence. They shouldnt have wasted the resources or the money or the time in holding this absolute waste of a time garbage donkey court. Just slap his wrist and say your such a naughty boy and dont treat your staff or horses like that then reward him with a 100.00 voucher to the telstra shop and only to purchase a phone battery. absolutely ridiculas. And keep out of your wifes knicker drawer.
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    all a matter of opinion

    thought the 12 months sentence was a touch harsh given the circumstances - think all this precendence talk is rubbish personally as it is a pretty unique case

    dont like the way he has been able to string it out (changed his plea twice and now appealling) whilst having runners unders his care
    +1 -1
  • silkssilks    53 posts
    please explain why this case is unique Della, confused :?
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    the device was never intended for use on an animal and it was not kept on the premises
    +1 -1
  • NatsNats    64 posts
    shook my head at a statement made by Richie Bell at Narrogin yesterday after the 3rd of Edwards winners.

    It was along to lines of...... its good to see as he needs all the support he can get at this time.

    what a load of crapola - you do the crime, you do the time!
    +1 -1
  • silkssilks    53 posts
    i wonder i wonder everybody is always on the lookout with ways to improve a horses performance and he justt happened to have these what a coincidents. Or a very distrustful human being. :evil:
    +1 -1
  • silkssilks    53 posts
    Nats i also heard him say something like cant remember the horses name but it was his horse it was something like and here comes blah blah with an electrifying run around the outside. Yeah just like trackwork :!: :!:
    +1 -1
  • slipatiptomeslipatiptome    3,351 posts
    Train Crusher was the horse..... circled the field charged clear and stole the race.
    +1 -1
  • MagicPussyMagicPussy    23 posts
    Why has he got a horse racing Saturday. Shouldn't that be scratched??
    +1 -1
  • slipatiptomeslipatiptome    3,351 posts
    Pending an appeal.
    +1 -1
  • BuddyBuddy    18 posts
    said:

    the device was never intended for use on an animal and it was not kept on the premises


    Was the intended use of the device for humans then??????
    +1 -1
  • jesteressjesteress    103 posts
    its incidents like these that take the SPORT out of racing, tuff penalties please!
    +1 -1
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    If it isnt used on animals whats it for ??? correct me if im wrong didnt he have 4 of them ??? also is it true that its strobger than a taser ??if so why would you buy them as he has young kids ???? strange very strange ,how did he get them past customs
    +1 -1
  • MagicPussyMagicPussy    23 posts
    The turf club is being made look like idiots.
    So you are telling me, although he has been given 12 months suspension and has already pleaded guilty, he is appealing and is still allowed to train and have horses races. So is he only doing this so he gets the big races out the way and then he will accept his 12months.
    Doesn't make sense to me. Would only happen to the big trainers, wonder how a little trainer would get on :roll:
    +1 -1
  • thefalconthefalcon    20,481 posts
    Lets just wait and see how the appeal unfolds...... :wink:
    +1 -1
  • jigajiga    15 posts
    said:

    the device was never intended for use on an animal and it was not kept on the premises

    if you belive that mate you d belive anything
    +1 -1
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    said:

    said:

    the device was never intended for use on an animal and it was not kept on the premises

    if you belive that mate you d belive anything
    with a name like that you obviously know what they're for!
    +1 -1
This discussion has been closed.