In this Discussion
- [DeletedUser] July 2013
- AndrewCarter July 2013
- aussiereds July 2013
- Brubaker July 2013
- carey July 2013
- Chelsea July 2013
- DamienWyer July 2013
- dungy July 2013
- Fastmoney July 2013
- H-BOMBER July 2013
- JayJay July 2013
- Jordan July 2013
- JustanL July 2013
- LuckyLongshots July 2013
- magoo83 July 2013
- obrienrb July 2013
- Piston_Broke July 2013
- raconteur July 2013
- RIO July 2013
- Rodent July 2013
- RoisinDubh July 2013
- Semipropunter July 2013
- Tesseract July 2013
- TheDiva July 2013
- thefalcon July 2013
- theketaminekid July 2013
- Thoroly_Bread July 2013
- Thumper July 2013
- tony July 2013
- trooper July 2013
Who's Online
0 Members & 107 Non Members
Comments
I don't disagree with that comment but could have won today with a better ride could have been put into race not reefed out back.Would have been able to hold a posey off midfield easy did not need to be that far back.
H-BOMBER likes this post.
H-BOMBER likes this post.
The well-backed Fanicio was the unlucky horse in that race,The rider wanted to come to the outside of eventual winner The Corporation in the straight but changed his mind when that horse drifted out. Fanicio made its run inside that horse and was infront before and after the line but not where it counts, unfortunately.
and that was straight from the racebook on cris, so they did tell you, you just didn't look.
if he should have been allowed to ride without the full claim is another topic, but the relevant info WAS there.
i just saw rodent name in a mailman thread and naturally assumed rodent was having a go at mailman! =))
and the info is also on cris where the weights and allowances of the apprentices is there for anybody that can be bothered.
http://www.rwwa.com.au/home/thoroughbreds-racing-information-apprentice-jockey-riding-claims.html
RIO likes this post.
the only reason Malaika ran 3rd was that the rider of the 4th horse , stopped riding.
the difference says 1/4 length but it is well short of that.
H-BOMBER likes this post.
3 guesses??
goose likes this post.
raconteur dislikes this post.
was rodent condescending too??
i apologise for speaking, next time you can find it yourself.
Hey Tesste's The MRW is a grand invention first developed in WA mid '90s - you are the one being ridiculous if you don't avail this information and blindly believe that all apprentices will / can claim their full allowance.
More fool you !!! IMO
Oh and i was talking through my kick as i had it running into a nice place all up with Mantango....
[-(
stewards must have decided they have been working too hard lately, and overlooked.
RIO likes this post.
Apprentice jockey Tom Sadler added to his unenviable record with the stewards when he copped a 16-meeting suspension and a $1000 fine in separate incidents at Flemington on Saturday.
The suspension for careless rising arose from an incident in the Winter Championship final in which Sadler rode Under The Hat.
He pleaded guilty to causing interference to two runners near the 1400m.
Stewards also found him guilty of failing to claim his full 2kg allowance when he rode Midnight Glory in the Rising Stars Final.
Sadler claimed only 0.5kg in what was his fifth similar offence in the past two months.
JayJay likes this post.