In this Discussion
- BobbyDavis April 2015
- brady April 2015
- grandstandjockeys April 2015
- H-BOMBER April 2015
- kittrad April 2015
- Lady_Luck April 2015
- magoo83 April 2015
- PieMan April 2015
- SHOVHOG April 2015
- SuperSnoop April 2015
- thefalcon April 2015
- WesternWatchdog April 2015
Who's Online
0 Members & 2 Non Members
Question for you.
West Australian Racing
I have a question for you? Did you watch the race of Universal Moon? If so, Universal Moon was an alarming drifter. Why didn't the stewards go to Carbery at the barrier, alerting them that the horse is a drifter in the betting and your ride will be scrutinized. Shouldn't that be them doing their due diligence?
Comments
Strong surport for 2 other runners was the reason for the drift in Betting !
PieMan dislikes this post.
UM...barrier 7 o/o 7....
grandstandjockeys likes this post.
PieMan dislikes this post.
So, you are telling me that if your horse drifts, you are happy that they run down the track? You wouldn't want the stewards to keep the jockey in check. Seriously??????
The winner of that race walked up front, and Carbery parked his horse 3 wide. He never had a chance.
I follow a lot of horses on Betfair, and they aren't wrong often.
I knew I was in trouble with Universal Moon before the race was run. That doesn't give you confidence in the industry.
would you have been fretting if highly secret (bless it!) who drifted from about 4's to 7's got beaten?
its racing mate!
PieMan dislikes this post.
No Pie Man
If a horse drifts in betting stewards should watch closely and Query the Run
Betting fluctuations can cause betting drifts
Betfair does get it right more often then not
I'm certain you would have some allies in your criticism if this is what occurred, especially given the betting drift. But no. ... Carbery put his horse into the race, albeit three wide, to give himself some hope of winning. He displayed initiative. And to leave himself with no chance of being questioned by the stewards for failing to improve into a position that would give him a chance to finish in the best position possible. You can't ask for any more than that given the circumstances of that race. The problem for you is that you clearly had a bet on it.
If you can't handle losing without slandering someone don't bet Pieman. Or man up and don't slander someone when you lost.
As you stated- the winner walked up front. Why on earth would you be critical of the bloke because he was the only one to show initiative to get up near the pace? Oh that's right because you lost. Deal with it. It doesn't always go to plan.
Chelsea likes this post.
PieMan dislikes this post.
So, you are telling me that Carbery couldn't of showed initiative and put a bit of pressure and sat outside the leader? You are a joke!
Just to clear up what I was trying to say: I feel that he did show initiative. I think that is obvious in my post. Maybe there were too many words in there for you to comprehend.
If you are saying he didn't show initiative then I completely disagree. If you are saying he didn't go forward to be outside the leader I completely disagree.
Also I completely disagree that I had too many drinks last night- I was out to dinner with a great bunch of friends, I was the skipper. Then when I got home I read your "contribution" to this forum. In hindsight I should have known that responding to your joke of a thread was not a good idea. But hey we all make mistakes. Some close relatives of yours probably made at least one.
By the way it is "couldn't have" not "couldn't of". Just a Good Friday lesson for you since you are clearly not quite as well educated as some others on here. Not me though- I am a retard and a joke.
Happy Easter
Darkhorse likes this post.
The rail was out and the leader walked, and according to you, Carbery rode a brliant ride by sitting 3 wide.
And, don't forget, my initial gripe is for stewards to remind hoops that their rides will be scrutinized.
They named a stick after you, a fuc$ stick.
thefalcon dislikes this post.
I don't think there is such a stick by the way.
I'm not taking sides but at least get your assumptions right. The way the race was run universal moon was no chance wherever it settled.
All the jocks over here make plenty of mistakes, and if you're willing to back one from a bad barrier in a quality race, at that price, on a horse that isn't clearly the best horse in the race.......well, is that the jockeys fault???
thefalcon likes this post.
You keep making out that I'm asking for a million dollars, I'm asking stewards to do their job.
If you ask a lot of people why don't they back horses, and their usual replies are it's a mugs game and it's corrupt. So, how do we overcome this? I'm sure scrutinizing betting drifts and plunges, checking betfair accounts, and asking relevant questions is a step in the right direction.
SLIPPERGOLDEN, PieMan likes this post.
PieMan likes this post.
PieMan likes this post.
thefalcon, BobbyDavis likes this post.
PieMan dislikes this post.
Lady Luck, you must be a female jockey, as you've got no idea, also.
thefalcon dislikes this post.
PieMan dislikes this post.
BobbyDavis likes this post.
PieMan dislikes this post.
grandstandjockeys likes this post.
PieMan dislikes this post.
It's funny how everyone in "right" behind their keyboard? Your opinion means nothing to me. If you would like to change my opinion, I'll give you my address, where you won't be able to hide behind your keyboard
Feelin lucky drifted aswell and won pie man maybe eat a pie and have a glass of beer and chill out like you said everyone is entitled to an opinion